Justice must prevail. To hold them to account Miscarriage. Case file #11-0706 By J.B
Justice must prevail. To hold them to account Miscarriage. Case file #11-0706 By J.B
Signed in as:
Ladies, gentlemen, Welcome.
In this case, by them involved, Franklin J. Faveri relied heavily on the
Alliston O.P.P. Richard Conway Badge # 5910. And in doing so, Crown Attorney Franklin John Faveri did commit, Collusion, Corruption Deceit, Fabrication, Abstraction of Justice. when Crown Attorney Michell Levasseur, who arrived when Crown Attorney Franklin Faveri had clearly created such a case that it was clear to myself, to my Counsel Kimberly Hyslop that there was no case to be had, why, well you will find that out soon enough.
My Counsel Kimberly Hyslop played it like she was a lawyer who would defend me, to fight for me, well she ran at the end .to put it in my terms. Example throughout the trial judge would disrespect my lawyer. how so, well when she may not have been looking at him, i would see him smirk, grin and at times belittle her, some she would witness, and other times the judge would just grin and roll his eyes. And who was he doing this for, to see, no other than his old collogue Crown Attorney Franklin J. Faveri . You see the judge Enno Meijer's work along with Faveri for the past 10 years when he too was a Crown Attorney and then I had the Judge when he was the then crown Attorney. Who was in a previous Case was asking to judge to refuse me bail, and that crown Enno Meijer's or "Myers" got what he asked for and i was denied bail. Is that a conflict of interest, you dam right. so, getting back on the topic here, so Kimberly never had a chance, and you can find that in Ms Hyslop,s out line of Arguments at the bottom of the page . Page and paragraph to substanchuate the arguments and I've throught the trial transcripts in all of the trial pages I'll list where to find that time or event later, the time the judge was caught by my counsel, she had said, don't worry john, I'll be filing a complaint, but when i was found guilty , it was like she did a 180 and she just dismissed me the rest of the way,
Kimberly Hyslop made some serious mistakes, and would not listing to me, then i came to the conclusion. the crown threatened her, because she quit. she tried to blame me that i lost trust in her, but it was her who sided with the crown and not just left me but dumped me. throughout the trial Kim did not do too bad but it was very hard knowing because i had told her that this judge was a crown in my previous case ,on one occasion i was remanded, filling in for Crown Attorney Faveri who was in a different court room, so the now judge stood in on that remand and bail hearing, Ms. knew, but the trust was mixed and it was like days she would be with it , but I've since learned that's how it's done ,so it's hard for me to go to and complain to the upper law society of Canada.
Examples of Kimberly's F... Ups
Exhibit 2. I took that picture in 2005 ,my lawyer refused to challenge the witness to give the indifferences to the Crown Attorney Franklin J. Faveri. WHATS the issue with Exhibit 2.
Issue 2. (And the questioning and the outcome)
When one looks at all the exhibits and to what Deborah Campbell testifies, and says all theses pictures were taken soon after they turned the 11.000 pound Dump truck 180 degrees. Is when she took the pictures soon after, James Campbell himself i believe he was age 77 or 80. And Deborah Campbell, Deborah parks the truck facing west on the driveway as you see in Exhibit 3. Exhibit 2. the stark difference in that exhibit picture is how you can compere from exhibits 3,4,5,5A. and i will go more into that but i have this as a fact to say, if the years is in question and what i say well what cannot be questioned is ,what is to be seen and compared from exhibit 2 and exhibit 3. and i have detailed that in Exhibit 2. and that is made out very accrete, and is in Exhibit 3. and on this page below you will find the indifferences in Exhibit 2 and exhibit 3. So if we want to argue about the date ,its my ward as to The Witnesses ' and being right !00%. And being INNOCENT. And you see here its a lot ,ill state form facts that ,yes... You Franklin john Faveri . I challenge you anytime anyplace even now. do your colleague ask you. Frank you put an innocent man in jail , how could you. rune this mans life , 14 years and ill tell you today I've served every day in prison , no parole no nothing ,not even a pass for my mothers faunal when my sister was granted assisted death , i was not permitted to go to the faunal, and you berried me the best way you knew how.
Frank new all the inconsistency's and the stark indifferences, he knew the witness were lying and his own exhibits make that the obvious in evidence and my statement along with transcripts and videos' ,and some of his own wards in trial. Now in trial discloser to secure that statement i have just made case . Unfortunately My Council Kimberly Hyslop behaved no better. My notes are Key to the indifferences. The collision, the in discrepancy's, my notes related to all the discrepancy's, I john Atkinson was passing her properly in good time, for her to read them ,and put the question's to the witness Deborah Campbell. Kimberly failed to do so. i remember crystal clear everything that took place ,if you can call it a trial.
A FRIND OF MINE WHOS A POLICE OFFICER SAYS IT BEST - JOHN IT WAS A BOX JOB.
So i will say the year and why the picture cannot belong with the remaining exhibits ,3,4,5,and 5A .
you see along the driveway more snow.
you see that is the actual parking spot as you see the snow has fallen all around the dump truck and you can see truck has sheltered the ground you see the green disposable garbage bin you see behind that the basketball hoop you se the back board to it ,you see the ice and you can for the sake of …how do you make the distinction of location of where the bin is not in the other picture ,is done by the tree the in exhibit 2. the tree closest to the drivers side by the truck there's a large tree that has large branches and the shad by them branches and the way the other pictures you will see the same tree and the shading in them exhibit pictures , and what's noticeable is this , and in exhibit 2. there's that picture that stands out form the rest and here's why ,in all the other picture's they all line up to that one tree that also proves that exhibit cannot belong the key is in 3 parts.
A) The Green Bin
B) The amount of snow
C) Exhibits 3,4,5, are all taken on the south side of the driveway
Why is that important , Deborah was very wear of here situation and when she was taking the picture.. the first on she had was off my computer ,so when she took the exhibit pictures ,3,4,5, it means there was careful planning in arranging it all.
Deborah told me in the original plan was not what ended up being to what the charges , apparently some one wanted it to go this way and some one wanted it to go another way, but the time every one had there story's crossed , and that would be ...as i ..say .DEBORAH CAMPBELL, JAMES CAMPBELL ,JOSIE CAMPBELL ,DAN CANMPELL SUMMERFIELD ,RAYMOND CAMPBELL SUMMERFIELD ,AND THE CROWN AND ALLISTON O.P.P. DET, RICHARD CONWAY # 5910 . it is noticed more so while the preliminary hearing was shaping up ,and it was so bad for the crown to that point the witnesses all pretty can to answer more to say I don't know . I cant remember. I'm not sure. I cant recall. I don't remember that . I imagine i could of , may of ,its possible, and in the preliminary hearing , she could not be certain of anything ,could not recall and at the Preliminary hearing, my counsel was no other then Jonathan Bliss Now Justice for Bradford Court … the very court where they have all worked together as lawyer and crowns,( I'm not going to comment on Jonathan Bliss )
so i will continue to add in the coming days and start putting this page in its proper perspective
Campbell did as she was asked by the Alliston O.P.P. Richard Conway # 5910 and in turn, discussed by Crown Attorney Franklin J. Faveri and that information is in part by video.is Is surmised by Det .Richard Conway # 5910 and Deborah, and in trial is giving other information that is the jest of things...said are …look we just want to lock Mr. Atkinson up for a very long time. and we can do it but... we need you to give us information ,and so that's what your going to also find along with pictures...and the mistakes and the many attempts, and restarts, and even with all the hundreds of contradictions and each execution's made by Crown Attorney Franklin J. Faveri, Ms. Campbell just could not remember each lie its in the trial transcripts is just so laughable yet sad ( ALWAYS KEEP IN MIND THIS IS SOMEONES LIFE ,A HUMAN BEING ) and i cannot express enough just how SICK Crown Attorney Franklin Faveri is. and we all have experienced them who lie and in this case we have Crown Attorney Frank Faveri to is going along in this …And it is criminal ,who invested in this Criminal intent … A judge who so willing plays so Dumb...its just so phatic...i say is that way because all that i say can be proved and I'm going to do that … I make serious accusations and allegations .. and why do i ...as i make the case of my innocence .. I'm also CHALLANGING Attorney Franklin Faveri , to take a stand and well when I'm all said and done …well he's guilty of the most hennies Crime, to be that pathetic . To Disgraced to them who take an Oath to have to work in any legal form ,Office ,Courtroom can only feel so Suspect ,so Withdrawn , suspicious of being as his behavior
as if it was the rest taken in 2010, and i would tell Hyslop that's not that same amount of snow in exhibit 2 there's much less. there is a green disposable bin, and you can use the trees as a marker, and you don't see the green disposable garbage bin in Exhibit 3 or 4 or 5
the case can easily be made in the simplest terms as the evidence will be set out in that order. the collusion is made out months before there was a charge laid. To give you some contexed I'll say it like this.
This is a long form text area designed for your content that you can fill up with as many words as your heart desires. You can write articles, long mission statements, company policies, executive profiles, company awards/distinctions, office locations, shareholder reports, whitepapers, media mentions and other pieces of content that don’t fit into a shorter, more succinct space.
Articles – Good topics for articles include anything related to your company – recent changes to operations, the latest company softball game – or the industry you’re in. General business trends (think national and even international) are great article fodder, too.
Mission statements – You can tell a lot about a company by its mission statement. Don’t have one? Now might be a good time to create one and post it here. A good mission statement tells you what drives a company to do what it does.
Company policies – Are there company policies that are particularly important to your business? Perhaps your unlimited paternity/maternity leave policy has endeared you to employees across the company. This is a good place to talk about that.
Executive profiles – A company is only as strong as its executive leadership. This is a good place to show off who’s occupying the corner offices. Write a nice bio about each executive that includes what they do, how long they’ve been at it, and what got them to where they are.
Evidence , well there is plenty of evidence , I've pervaded trial transcripts ,the preliminary the crown Attorney Franklin J. Faveri requested the publication ban but there are some very interesting and very confusing ,and a lot of ,i don't know ,i don't remember, and plenty of all that ,as well as I'm not sure, I don't think so, i will be able to put in some of the preliminary hearing transcripts that we made reference, as she didn't Or she just couldn't remember . knows pretty much nothing to as to what they coached her to give in evidence ,and yes she just could get it right, you may be wondering why i say it that way I for one know the crime never took place , and i don't think Ms. Campbell took this venture ,unless and its is said in one part of the transcript , but they ad aside if you don't help us well charge you and you would face some jail time , remember Ms. Campbell , talking to me on the phone, and hers what she said - John they don't want me to talk to you I'm sorry they said ill go to jail , and i said look do what you have to do ,i dont want you in jail , so she started crying and she said its going to be terrible , i have to go john i cant contact you, you cant call me ill get in trouble.
As i will and as i learn more on building my web page , i will continue to add and keep you all informed I want to thank all the lady's and gentleman for coming back to read and learn more , and i can tell you , there's just so much corruption, the evidence is right here ,there is no evidence that the crown can rely on, and there's nothing to show the crown has made his case. J.B.A.
**Trial day 1. October 8. 2013**
I have decided to stay to the facts and issue at hand
Right to the Reasonable Doubt:
page 122-para 14 through 33
page 123-para 1 through 33
page 124-1 through 33
To put out all the transcript of October 24 is just more lies and pages of the witnesses inaccuracies. but are very good the have ,Daniel ,with the other brother, i have focused of the later part, is of the testimony of Raymond where he has at that time in trial ,is not on script and gives up. And just becomes truthful ,that the dump truck was backed in.
And just starts becoming honest for the very first time and goes on to state ,the front of the truck was in the opposite direction as to what the crown was insisting and Deborah Campbell ,Raymond comes clean about the direction of the dump truck and that the dump truck ,and then it proves by his honesty John Atkinson never attempted any such event. as Raymond talks about how they worked to drive the truck out , Raymond goes on to in detail how its was for him to drive the truck out from that area is Clear on the work he took to get the the dump truck out Raymond confirms as i have proven. No crime ever took place , What was required was to jack up the back and put boars there under the Read Duel wheels ,and the Front wheels and the truck would be jacked up the bords pleased under each tire The boards that you do see in Exhibit 5 and 5-A are in places where each wheel ,
to put things in perspective , I know from talking to Deborah Campbell while i was out in Alberta ,Fort MacMurray ,
Raymond contradicts Main Crowns witness Deborah's, her testimony is completely different and puts her in serious jeopardy, Raymond gives evidence that is consistent with Mr. Atkinson in all the evidence of exhibits. Here's what happened its shown in all the evidence and what i testified to, there's really not much to say, Deborah testified to the constable that she spun the puck up truck and it went in the ditch that's her evidence at court, and to the constable, till she changes it again, i asked Deborah to call C.A.A. and she did that the reason the pick up truck was in the ditch and needed to be towed back and on that particular night the dump truck was on the parking pad , i went in the truck and started up the truck, reversed out and engaged the truck forward Highway County Rd.50
And ill remind you ,this is not about who can be the best actor. Who can spin B...S...story. Whos the best story teller. And the Judge knowing that unequivocally, Ms. Deborah Campbell has consistently lied. and to support that statement ill give you page after page ,and at each paragraph to make my statement a fact, and then we will find in the judges reasons for judgement, that there are no bases in his finding AT ALL . And on each of his findings . well have the trial transcript that will indicate that there cannot be any truth to the judges reason of guilt ,in fact the judge in much of his findings ,he is clearly mistaken in what he says and what i say in my evidence , ha actually states as truth ,in his belief , but he is the only one who speaks of what he says ,but it cant be found in any of the trial transcripts , so here we have a judge who adds his own evidence that no one said , and this is also what the Crown Franklin Faveri dose when Deborah Campbell , cannot follow to what the crown is trying to get her to say , such as Faveri tries to add in his evidence to support a conviction ,and the witness responds and say to the Crown ,I don't remember there being 2 rocks , And the crown is now looking and shaking his head , it a sight to be seen , but there it is in the transcript ,and I'm up on my feet and to my lawyer , i say ,he just tried to add in his own evidence , testimony of Raymond ,all of what he states, what i state , and in the exhibits,Alan Morris, it coincides with our expert ,and reading from 2nd day of Trial transcript OCTOBER 24,2013 . .page 123-Para 19 to 31 and page 124 para 1 to 5 and that's Crown witness for the crown Raymond and above all you have damming evidence that is more than reasonable doubt the pictures show the direction , you have the trees inchers from Rock - C ,you have the same length showing of dirt as the truck sheltered the ground below the truck , you have the rear wheels two on each side of the rear of the dump truck and you look to where the dirt is showing and I've marked where the front wheels had dug down a bit . This is a 4X4 1 ton 350 , what raises also reasonable doubt , is you have mother nature there to show you where the truck was parked .You have Deborah saying the truck was facing east the opposite direction what does mother nature show dose not show us ,you see no dirt, you see a tree that's 4 to 5 feet tall and the tree is in prefect form no sign of the tree height , you have Deborah who when asked to place the front wheels where they were position .( see exhibit 5 - A - ) with that you have a court Authenticated exhibit 5 - A - .she draws a differential straddled across Rock - C - . and dose the very same . now our Expert Allan Morris has been to the residence and not with out Resistance From Deborah ,each of these Granit Boulders are measured form center to center the longest distance ,on and the shortest distance distance each Bolder ,you see in this trial you can find every lie , from Deborah ,and why do i make such a profound statement ,I say it with Confidence and i dear any one to challenge me on the evidence, you see it dose not matter what i say , They say, you ,the crown or the witness can all play to be the best actor ,in the end this case if covered in math
Outline of Argument's - Self-Represented. C-F 11-0706
The Outline of Arguments. Are shocking, here you will find Collusion, Fabrications, Deceit, Contradiction. Outright lying. Conspiracy. To Our benefit. We are Supported by Case law.
It's beyond SHOCKING.The Preliminary Hearing !!! NO EVIDENCE.They ?FRANKLIN JOHN FAVERI Of Barrie Court House.MICHELLE LAVASSURE Orillia Court House.O.P.P. Detective Richad Conway .Pressured Deborah Campbell that if she didn't cooperate she would face serious charges if she contioued to help John Atkinson. This Deborah Campbell had never help Mr.Atkinson in any way. BUT The O.P.P. were relentless at confronting her at her place of work, blocking her car with there cruser.Avevnchely she seen know way out but to cooroperate so with such exhibits she agreed.Forced to do what would keep Mr.Atkinson in prison for a very long time, .Det Conway says as much himself and in the O.PP. Video statement between the two of them Det.Conway is coaching Ms.Deborah Campbell . Is on video CORRECTING TIME'S ,CORRECTING DATE'S, CORRECTING YEAR'S. And CORRECTING, throughout the video statement.it becomes so convaloted. When it comes to the times of coming to give a video statement was given under dures. When talking about pictures of the Dump truck, she is more confused of what she's got for them that when the prelinaryhearing begins she has the photograph of the dump truck as Mr.Atkinson has always maintained that the dump truck is backed in.At some point somthing happens, with the crown, the .O.P.P. And Jonathan Bliss my counsel.at that very moment i lostthe confadence of my lawyer . TO BE CONTINUED .J.B.A.
Concocted a story and .David North knew it. And the trial transcripts support that. Below i present to you our outline of arguments. Are very aureate and supported by trial transcripts. And there's more that needs to be added, this will be done in accordance as i see fit as I proceed and make the Trial Transcript available to this site. And well reach, the criminal intent by Attorney General Franklin john Faveri Alliston O.P.P. Detective Richard Conway. And the Justice Enno Myers, who was the crown prior to being appointed to the bench. Did work sis by side with; Crown Attorney Franklin John Faveri. presided in the trial proceedings.
By Mr. Atkinson
WOW serious ,serious contradiction, the lies ,and decet ,and no one said anything, and with so much there is no other explanation. Full stop. Abstraction by justice, i have made out on them who took an oath
Transcripts were read, and I john Atkinson, and any error are fault of my own .cross reference is done by me .I have taken the time to find the most serious inconsistency's, and he is the judge who found Deborah to be very creatable .
this was extremally hard to go through as the trial progressed she changed her story so many times ,out right lied ,and when
the judge was amused in tandem would be Franklin J. Faveri, simply put look at exhibit 5-A. when watching the judge . Was held crown would not give it up befor the preliminary hearing Deborah was showing the phone which had all the picture's
At that time I had Jonathan Bliss, who is now a judge in Brantfoerd and Barrie Court house . He would not let me see them, and each picture she had ,she did hold up for me to see with the phone flat against the bench seats ,each picture she did this for me.
It was a real problem from the getgo ,so each of them times when it was happening, the judge would take deep breaths or would laugh and a smirk i mean shes saying where the dump truck was paked on Rock-C ,just tottaly inpossable ,and again we all knew this to .And i can tell you there was nothing in this case to laugh about that's how this trial ran, Deborah was permitted to make up this and that when she got lost in her lies she would say ,well why don't you ask me something else. The reaction from the crown and judge was was laughable so here you have Ms. Campbell ,the crown and the judge belittling my lawyer , humiliated her , Deborah made cracks at my Counsel, often ,the abuse was like so bad . I don't think anyone had experienced, this kind of behavior
where in Canada that a Criminal trial goes from 2011 to 2019. dose any one know any other case ,I would like to read it , i mean that's 9 years please get back to me ,crown and Judge Meijer's and Crown Franking Faveri felt is was business as usual at Barrie Court House in 2011 Barrie Ontario 2019